Thursday, 17 September 2026 · Europe
EUR/USD 1.154 EUR/GBP 0.8574 EUR/CHF 0.9449 EUR/PLN 4.347 All rates →
Sign in · Join
EUROPES The European Report
European Edition Thursday, 17 September 2026
LATEST At least five killed and more than a dozen injured in Russian attacks on Ukraine Le Flash →
Tech & Startups

Google defends a ‘crisis actor’ video at Australia’s antisemitism inquiry

Google defends a ‘crisis actor’ video at Australia’s antisemitism inquiry

A Google executive told an Australian inquiry that a video smearing a shooting survivor as a “crisis actor” meets YouTube’s standards. So it stays online. Google has defended keeping up a conspiracy video about a mass shooting in Sydney, the Associated Press reports. The clip falsely paints a wounded survivor of the antisemitic massacre as […] This story continues at The Next Web

A Google executive told an Australian inquiry that a video smearing a shooting survivor as a “crisis actor” meets YouTube’s standards. So it stays online.

Google has defended keeping up a conspiracy video about a mass shooting in Sydney, the Associated Press reports . The clip falsely paints a wounded survivor of the antisemitic massacre as a “crisis actor.” Google Australia manager Rachel Lord told a government inquiry the video met YouTube’s standards and would stay online. Senior staff had reviewed the call, she said.

In December, two gunmen attacked a Hanukkah celebration in Sydney and killed 15 people. One survivor, Arsen Ostrovsky, took a minor head wound. Within hours, an image of his bleeding head spread on X, and the abuse began.

The YouTube video went further. Four men mocked his wound as “very crisis actor-ish,” pointed to “makeup,” and called him an “intelligence asset” with a “degree in theater.” It branded the massacre a “false flag.” Lord gave evidence to a government inquiry into antisemitism in Australia, which is examining how such hate spreads online.

Richard Lancaster, the lawyer leading the inquiry, said the video staying up exposed a “really serious deficiency” in YouTube’s hate-speech rules. Lord replied that she appreciated his “feedback.” “We have spent a lot of time thinking about where we draw the line,” she said, adding that the company keeps re-evaluating it.

The case lays bare the gap between what feels monstrous and what a moderation policy actually forbids. It also points to a newer threat. Ostrovsky says he has faced AI manipulation since the attack.

The inquiry even saw an AI-generated image of him laughing while someone daubs on fake blood. That is the old problem multiplying, cheap AI fakes aimed at a named victim.

Australia is not waiting. Regulators there are arming themselves with bigger fines and testing an under-16 social media ban . Other governments push too. India has ordered Meta to pull harmful content, and Europe keeps beating Google in court.

The platforms still write the rulebook, though, and this hearing shows how much room it leaves. The video stays up.

More from Tech & Startups